Review Ganzo G720 VS Ganzo G722
Introduction
The g720 and g722 are the
"tank" reference of Ganzo, its heaviest folder knives, large and
strong in theory. However, if we look at sales we will see that the G720 is
much much more sold. Why?.
The reason for this article is to
answer that question, and see if it has logical motives that behavior. Also
give my opinion on which one seems better to me.
Exterior design and appearance
I must say, that the answer to
why the G720 has been sold much more almost i could response it already, it’s
very simple: when an affordable folder knife is based on the appearance of
another "Premium" range, sales are usually triggered, and The Lion
Steel SR1 is to blame for being so popular. But let's investigate a little
more...
Above G720. Below G722.
·
Comparison of measures
Total length
|
Blade
length
|
Blade width
|
Blade
thickness
|
Weight
|
|
Ganzo G720
|
21
cm
|
9
cm
|
3.2
cm
|
4
mm
|
208 gr
|
Ganzo G722
|
21
cm
|
9
cm
|
3.2
cm
|
4
mm
|
206 gr
|
Above G720. Below G722.
Above G720. Below G722.
Left G722. Right G720.
Blade
They look the same, but they are not, look at the less
pronounced curvature of the G722 in relation to the G720. In addition the tip
is more incisive in the G722, but also thinner. Thin to the point that i do not
think it is so good in a folder knife so strong that it is intended for
bushcraft and field tasks because these types of tools need strong tips when
working with wood for example. If you look, the bushcraft knives usually have
enough thickness up near the tip because its purpose is not penetration, it is
the fortress. In the case of the G720 it is clearly thicker by the tip, which
for me makes it a much more logical folder knife with respect to its exterior
appearance and the function for which it has been designed.
Above G720. Below G722.
Left G720. Right G722.
Above G720. Below G722.
There is a
difference of finish at the top of the blade, while in the G720 it is rounded
and does not reflect much light, in the G722 it is sharp and reflects much
more. I think in the video you can see well.
·
Handle
Visually i
like much more the appearance of the handle of the G720, surely for having
double handle scales and for its textured, but also has a more rounded form
laterally than the G722. But i must admit that the handle of the G722 fits me
very well in the hand, it is very nice to grab it. It is normal that there is
no traction on the side of the "frame lock" but i was surprised how
well it fits to the hand.
Detail of the texture of the G720 handle
Detail of the texture of the G722 handle
Handling and use
Before comparing them i have to
say that the retention of the blade in the G722 is quite poor, that makes it
open very softly clear, since you do not have to overcome with your finger
pushing a great force contrary, but i worry a little it can open itself with
movements if you carry it in your pocket. I have seen other G722 that were even
worse than my unit and the retention was almost nil, but it is not normal, with
such a heavy blade (easier to open by its own weight) has not put a retention
at least normal.
Metal washer G722
Metal washer G720
The G720 has more blade retention
thanks to its "axis lock" system, but that is no reason why a liner
lock or frame lock does not have adequate retention, since in other models with
these lock systems the retention is perfectly executed. To give an example of
the brand, the Ganzo G743 has much much more strength to retain its blade,
clearly much lighter weight in addition. I'm not saying that's reason enough
not to buy the G722, but it's clearly below the expected strength, but it even
seems that not all G722 come out with the same problem, some are a little worse
than others in that respect. Perhaps the transport in a case is a good advice
for this particular model.
· Locking
Well, we are
not going to debate now if it is better a "frame lock" or an "axis
lock", a great debate. We will analyze the locking of both models, not to
speak of such blocking systems in general.
The "axis
lock" of the G720 seems good to me, and as i have said some times, it fits
more part of the locking bar on the blade than in other models of Ganzo,
especially older ones. However, it is not difficult to skip this locking system
on Ganzo models by "battoning" or hitting the spine, but it depends
on the model and even on your particular copy, you do not see a concrete criterion
to happen or not in which i have been able to see.
The frame lock
of the G722 is cut with amazing precision, has stabilizer and is well done. It
has a cut to make it easier to remove with your finger and is thicker than it
actually looks, because those cuts make it look thinner.
Frame lock detail G722
Frame lock detail G722
Specifically
me, i rely more on this locking system of the G722 than on the G720 in the
absence of testing under similar conditions. It is a shame that Ganzo does not
now take pure “frame locks” but hybrids between "liner lock" and
"frame lock", that although they are well, i prefer the traditional
ones.
·
Ergonomics
I'm going to
talk about the sensations in the hand of each ones and their differences:
When picking
up the G720, the sensations are very good, the handle is large and wide, good
guard and "jimping" on the blade for the finger, and what does not
fit perfectly in my hand is that the guard has a slightly pronounced angle and
it gives me a similar feeling to the Y-Start Jin02, as if i did not fit my
finger into it. But I say that in general a very good feeling, to me it is of
those knives that draw me a smile when i get it.
As for the
G722, also the sensations are very good, but however, although it seems almost
equal to the G720, varies: the handle is more straight on the sides, it is not
rounded laterally like the G720, i prefer that curvature outwards. And the
"jimping" of the blade of the G722 is with steps much softer and
separate than the G720, in addition it is a little longer also, i feel better
with the one of the G722 (apart has a zipper in the handle). The guard is also
a little more comfortable on the G722.
Left G722. Right G720.
Actually for
me it is almost more comfortable the G722 but the straight handles on the sides
doesn’t like me like the rounded ones and it feels quite the difference.
Final verdict
Well, although they are two folder
knives that at first sight look very very similar, really divided into sections
i like the G720 more everything except the locking system, which i prefer the
G722.
A folder knife like the G720 is
very suitable and chosen for bushcraft or field, i like the exaggerated
curvature of its blade more than the G722, and especially the greater thickness
of tip that gives the G720.
Left G722. Right G720.
Detail of the tip in G720
Detail of the tip in G722
On the other hand, the weak blade
retention of the G722 is to me the worst of the knife and I would be careful to
take it in a sheath in the field. It's a real shame that a folder knife so good
has that problem. As i said before, the Ganzo G743 with "frame lock"
having a blade that weighs much less (and less likely to be opened by its weight)
has a much better retention. And the Enlan EW054 with "liner lock"
has a retention so strong that i can not open it almost using the "thumb
studs"
Therefore, let us value:
Global Aesthetics: G720
Aesthetics blade: G720
Aesthetic handle: G720
Use of the blade: G720
Use of the handle: Draw, although
with different sensations.
Blade retention: G720
Locking: G722
And that is my personal
assessment, although it coincides in this case on the much more popular and
sold G720. But i have to say that both the G720 and the G722 are two very good
knives and Ganzo's top exponent of the "tank" folder knives, the
strongest it has ever made, and who knows if we will ever see something similar
with Firebird, which rather tries to lighten weight and reduce size, time will
tell if they will continue these two great heavyweights in every way...
Moving
Moving
A comparison of G720 with CIMA M7 folder will be great
ReplyDeleteThank you!
I don't have at this time the Cima M7.
DeleteThank you for your comment.
Regards!
How do you think g723 will work for minor bushcraft (including light batoning) ?
ReplyDeleteWell... i do not recommend to do battoning with a folder knife, even with a no full tang fixed knife.
DeleteSaid this, i do not have the g723 but seeing its features, i think could work for MINOR bushcraft, but the battoning is another thing and it could be damaged the lock system. Take off the lock bar if you do that.
Really, if its for bushcraft, i would choose the g722 better (with frame lock too) or the g720 before the g723.
Regards!
Thank you. Really, I ha e been trying to think of a reason for me to buy the g723 but it's not fitting in my system.
DeleteI also have a cima 1 which is of course much better than folders for batoning work.
Yes, a fixed knife is better for battoning.
DeleteNowadays NO knife with scales.should be used for chopping (Battoning), wood or otherwise.
DeleteThere are one piece (no scale fixed knives and small slim hand axes that fit on belt, That do a much better job and take up no room.
Personally. I have a 50+ yr old Martiini, moulded handle. does all my serious work, with several folders, Mainly Puma and a coupla modern Chinese (Ganzo). Plus a small 440C steel blade hand axe.
You going bush. Go bush properly. If you saving weight to the n'th degree. YOU have got a problem.
Or a weakling.
Hi Macka.
DeleteTheese knives are strong. May be two of the best folder knives for bushcraft from ganzo. They have a wide blade, very strong, wide handle and thick back edge.
It is better a fixed knife for bushcraft, but in the folder knives world, theese are two good pieces.
J'ai le G720 ,c'est un couteau très robuste ,lourd et prévu pour le bushcraft ,finition parfaite et prix très doux§
ReplyDeleteC'est l'un des couteaux les plus solides de toutes les marques chinoises, en plus de l'un de mes couteaux préférés. Excellente, également ouverture très douce, plus que les autres modèles Ganzo en raison du poids de la lame. Très bonne.
Delete